with the collaboration of Iranian Food Science and Technology Association (IFSTA)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Science and Fisheries, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, P. O. Box : 578. Sari, Iran.

2 Instructor, Faculty Member of Caspian Aquatic Aquatic Institute, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: With the growing population and following the efforts of food production industries, more waste is produced which can be recovered by adding value and brought them back into the cycle of production and consumption. The reason behind is firstly the reduction of waste and secondly the economic importance of value added resultant products. Aquaculture sector produces large volume of wastes including the head, tail, fins, spine, and most importantly their viscera. If the waste managed properly, valuable materials such as hydrolyzed protein powder (the resulting waste hydrolysis using proteases enzymes) and fish oil (byproduct of enzymatic hydrolysis) can be produced. In this study rainbow trout waste was chosen, due to its large volume production in the country. The functional properties and antioxidant activity of hydrolysates as well as the oil fatty acid profile are the main factors to be considered. This study was aimed to investigate the hydrolysis of rainbow trout viscera (oncorhynchus mykiss) by protamex and neutrase enzymes individually and compare the functional properties and antioxidants activity of protein hydrolysate as well as analyze the fatty acid profile of fish oil obtained as by-product of enzymatic hydrolysis process.

Materials and methods: Rainbow trout viscera (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were obtained from the fish market in Sari and transported in ice containers to the laboratory. Protamex and neutrase enzymes were purchased from Novozymes Company and protein hydrolysates prepared enzymatically according to the method of Guerard et al. (2002). Proximate analysis was carried out according to the procedures outlined by the AOAC (1995). Degree of hydrolysis determined as described by Hoyle and Merritt (1994). Peptide chain length (PCL) was measured using the method of Adler-Nissen and Olsen (1979). Protein recovery (PR) determined using the method used by Ovissipour et al (2009). Protein solubility for hydrolysates was determined using the method of Robinson and Hodgen (1940). Foam stability index was measured according to the method described by Sathe and Salunkhe (1981). Water holding capacity (WHC) was determined using the method of Rodriguez-Ambriz et al. (2005). DPPH radical-scavenging activity was measured using the method of Yen and Wu (1999). Reducing power was determined by the method of Oyaiza (1986).The chelating activity on Fe2+ was determined, using the method of Decker and Welch (1990).

Results & Discussion: Protamex leads to the production of protein powder with higher degree of hydrolysis (34.76 ± 2.92%) and protein recovery (68/16 ± 1.98%) compared to neutrase (p0.05) despite the difference in L* value. The viscera oil contains 34% monounsaturated, 34.49% polyunsaturated and 31.4% saturated fatty acid. Apart from pH 4 (isoelectric point), the solubility of both protein powders in water was remarkable (more than 90%). The foam activity and stability index of hydrolyzate produced by protamex were more desirable than hydrolyzate produced by neutrase, whereas at pH 6, these indices reached to their maximum values of 200.13± 9.31% and 135.6 ± 5.64 %, respectively. Furthermore, water holding capacity of both hydrolyzates was measured as approximately 4.5 ml/g protein (p>0.05). Protamex leads to the production of protein powder with the higher DPPH radical scavenging activity compared to hydrolyzate produced by neutrase. Conversely, the reducing power of hydrolyzate produced by neutrase was higher than that of protamex (p0.05).

Keywords

اویسی پور م.، قمی م.ر. 1387. بیوتکنولوژی در تولید فراورده‌های دریایی. انتشارات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تنکابن. 104-
اویسی پور م.، عابدیان کناری ع.، معتمدزادگان ع.، نظری ر. 1389. بررسی خواص پروتئین‌های هیدرولیز شده امعاء و احشاء ماهی تون زردباله (Thunnus albacares) با استفاده از آنزیم های تجاری. نشریه پژوهش های علوم و صنایع غذایی ایران، جلد 6، شماره 1، 76-68
بخشان ع.، علیزاده دوغیکلایی ا.، طاهری ع. 1393. بررسی خواص آنتی‌اکسیدانی پروتئین آبکافتی بدست آمده از ضایعات، در فرایند فیله کردن ماهی آزاد (Salmo salar). پاتوبیولوژی مقایسه‌ای، سال یازدهم، شماره 1، 1152-1143
فاطمی ح .، 1378، شیمی مواد غذایی، شرکت سهامی انتشار. چاپ نهم، 78-82
ملااحمدی ن .، فرهوش ر.، شریف ع. 1393. بررسی ساختار اسید چرب روغن ماهی کیلکا. همایش ملی علوم و فناوریهای نوین در صنایع غذایی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تربت حیدریه، یازدهم دیماه 1393.
Adler-Nissen, J. & Olsen, H. 1979. The influence of peptide chain length on taste and functional properties of enzymatically modified soy protein. In Food Chemistry (A.Pour-El, ed.) American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
AOAC, W. H. (2005). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
Bueno-Solano, C., Lopez-Cervantes, J., Campas-Baypoli, O. N., Lauterio-Garcia, R., Adan-Bante, N. P., & Sanchez-Machado, D. I. (2009). Chemical and biological characteristics of protein hydrolysates from fermented shrimp by-products. Food chemistry, 112(3), 671-675.
Chobert, J. M., Bertrand-Harb, C., & Nicolas, M. G. (1988). Solubility and emulsifying properties of caseins and whey proteins modified enzymically by trypsin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 36(5), 883-892.
Chiang, W. D., Shih, C. J., & Chu, Y. H. (1999). Functional properties of soy protein hydrolysate produced from a continuous membrane reactor system. Food Chemistry, 65(2), 189-194.
Deeslie, W. D., & Cheryan, M. (1988). Functional properties of soy protein hydrolyzates from a continuous ultrafiltration reactor. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 36(1), 26-31.
Decker, E. A., & Welch, B. (1990). Role of ferritin as a lipid oxidation catalyst in muscle food. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 38(3), 674-677.
Dos Santos, S. D. A., Martins, V. G., Salas-Mellado, M., & Prentice, C. (2011). Evaluation of functional properties in protein hydrolysates from bluewing searobin (Prionotus punctatus) obtained with different microbial enzymes. Food and bioprocess technology, 4(8), 1399-1406.
Elavarasan, K., Naveen Kumar, V., & Shamasundar, B. A. (2014). Antioxidant and functional properties of fish protein hydrolysates from fresh water carp (Catla catla) as influenced by the nature of enzyme. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 38(3), 1207-1214.
Guerard, F., Guimas, L., & Binet, A. (2002). Production of tuna waste hydrolysates by a commercial neutral protease preparation. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 19, 489-498.
Gbogouri, G. A., Linder, M., Fanni, J., & Parmentier, M. (2004). Influence of hydrolysis degree on the functional properties of salmon byproducts hydrolysates. Journal of food science, 69(8), C615-C622.
Gimenez, B., Gomez-Estaca, J., Aleman, A., Gomez-Guillen, M. C., & Montero, M. P. (2009). Physico-chemical and film forming properties of giant squid (Dosidicus gigas) gelatin. Food Hydrocolloids, 23(3), 585-592.
Halling, P. J. (1981). Protein stabilized foams and emulsions. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science, 12, 155–203.
Hoyle, N. T., & Merritt, J. O. H. N. (1994). Quality of fish protein hydrolysates from herring (Clupea harengus). Journal of Food Science, 59(1), 76-79.
Kunte, L. A., Gennadios, A., Cuppett, S. L., Hanna, M. A., & Weller, C. L. (1997). Cast films from soy protein isolates and fractions 1. Cereal Chemistry, 74(2), 115-118.
Kristinsson, H. G. (1998). Reaction kinetics, biochemical and functional properties of salmon muscle proteins hydrolyzed by different alkaline proteases.
Kristinsson, H. G., & Rasco, B. A. (2000). Fish protein hydrolysates: production, biochemical, and functional properties. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 40(1), 43-81.
Klompong, V., Benjakul, S., Kantachote, D., & Shahidi, F. (2007). Antioxidative activity and functional properties of protein hydrolysate of yellow stripe trevally (Selaroides leptolepis) as influenced by the degree of hydrolysis and enzyme type. Food chemistry, 102(4), 1317-1327.
Layne, E. (1957). [73] Spectrophotometric and turbidimetric methods for measuring proteins. Methods in enzymology, 3, 447-454.
Linder, M., Fanni, J., & Parmentier, M. (1996). Functional properties of veal bone hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science, 61(4), 712-716.
Martin, A. H., Grolle, K., Bos, M. A., Stuart, M. A. C., & van Vliet, T. (2002). Network forming properties of various proteins adsorbed at the air/water interface in relation to foam stability. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 254(1), 175-183.
Nalinanon, S., Benjakul, S., & Kishimura, H. (2010). Biochemical properties of pepsinogen and pepsin from the stomach of albacore tuna (Thunnus alalunga). Food Chemistry, 121(1), 49-55.
Nalinanon, S., Benjakul, S., Kishimura, H., & Shahidi, F. (2011). Functionalities and antioxidant properties of protein hydrolysates from the muscle of ornate threadfin bream treated with pepsin from skipjack tuna. Food Chemistry, 124(4), 1354-1362.
Oyaiza, M. (1986). Studies on products of browning reaction: Antioxidative activity of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Journal of nutrition.44, 307–315.
Onodenalore, A. C., & Shahidi, F. (1996). Protein dispersions and hydrolysates from shark (Isurus oxyrinchus). Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 5(4), 43-59.
Ovissipour, M., Abedian, A., Motamedzadegan, A., Rasco, B., Safari, R., & Shahiri, H. (2009). The effect of enzymatic hydrolysis time and temperature on the properties of protein hydrolysates from Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) viscera. Food Chemistry, 115(1), 238-242.
Ovissipour, M., Benjakul, S., Safari, R., & Motamedzadegan, A. (2010). Fish protein hydrolysates production from yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares head using alcalase and protamex. International Aquatic Research, 2, 87-95.
Pearson, A. M. (1983). Soy proteins. In B. J. F. Hudson (Ed.), Developments in food proteins-2(pp. 67–108). Essex, England: Applied Science Publishers
Pak, C. S. 2005. Stability and quality of fish oil during typical domestic application. Final Project. Wonsan University of fisheries Kangwon Province, DPR of Korea.
Pacheco-Aguilar, R., Mazorra-Manzano, M. A., & Ramirez-Suarez, J. C. (2008). Functional properties of fish protein hydrolysates from Pacific whiting (Merluccius productus) muscle produced by a commercial protease. Food Chemistry, 109(4), 782-789.
Robinson, H. W., & Hogden, C. G. (1940). The biuret reaction in the determination of serum proteins. 1. A study of the conditions necessary for the production of a stable color which bears a quantitative relationship to the protein concentration. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 135, 707-725.
Ruxton, C. H. S., Reed, S. C., Simpson, M. J. A., & Millington, K. J. (2004). The health benefits of omega‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: a review of the evidence. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 17(5), 449-459.
Rodriguez-Ambriz, S. L., Martinez-Ayala, A. L., Millan, F., & Davila-Ortiz, G. (2005). Composition and functional properties of Lupinus campestris protein isolates. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 60(3), 99-107.
Ren, J., Wang, H., Zhao, M., Cui, C., & Hu, X. (2010). Enzymatic hydrolysis of grass carp myofibrillar protein and antioxidant properties of hydrolysates. Czech Journal of. Food Science. Vol, 28(6), 475-484.
Spinelli, J., Koury, B., & Miller, R. (1972). Approaches to the utilization of fish for the preparation of protein isolates enzymic modifications of myofibrillar fish proteins. Journal of Food Science, 37(4), 604-608.
Sathe, S. K., & Salunkhe, D. K. (1981). Functional properties of the Great Northern bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) proteins: Emulsion, foaming, viscosity, and gelation properties. Journal of Food Science, 46(1), 71-81.
Shimada, K., Fujikawa, K., Yahara, K., & Nakamura, T. (1992). Antioxidative properties of xanthan on the autoxidation of soybean oil in cyclodextrin emulsion. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 40(6), 945-948.
Shahidi, F., Han, X. Q., & Synowiecki, J. (1995). Production and characteristics of protein hydrolysates from capelin (Mallotus villosus). Food chemistry, 53(3), 285-293.
Souissi, N., Bougatef, A., Triki-Ellouz, Y., & Nasri, M. (2007). Biochemical and functional properties of sardinella (Sardinella aurita) by-product hydrolysates. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 45(2), 187.
Safari, R., Motamedzadegan, A., Ovissipour, M., Regenstein, J. M., Gildberg, A., & Rasco, B. (2012). Use of hydrolysates from yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) heads as a complex nitrogen source for lactic acid bacteria. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 5(1), 73-79.
Thanonkaew, A., Benjakul, S., & Visessanguan, W. (2006). Chemical composition and thermal property of cuttlefish (Sepia pharaonis) muscle. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19(2), 127-133.
Taheri, A., Anvar, S. A. A., Ahari, H., & Fogliano, V. (2012). Comparison the functional properties of protein Hydrolysates from poultry byproducts and rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) viscera. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 12(1), 154-169.
Venugopal, V., & Shahidi, F. (1994). Thermostable water dispersions of myofibrillar proteins from Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus). Journal of food science, 59(2), 265-268.
Wilding, P., Lillford, P. J., & Regenstein, J. M. (1984). Functional properties of proteins in foods. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. Biotechnology, 34(3), 182-189.
Wilde, P. J., & Clark, D. C. (1996). The competitive displacement of β-lactoglobulin by Tween 20 from oil-water and air-water interfaces. Journal of colloid and interface science, 155(1), 48-54.
Wasswa, J., Tang, J., Gu, X. H., & Yuan, X. Q. (2007). Influence of the extent of enzymatic hydrolysis on the functional properties of protein hydrolysate from grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) skin. Food Chemistry, 104(4), 1698-1704.
Yen, G. C., & Wu, J. Y. (1999). Antioxidant and radical scavenging properties of extracts from Ganoderma tsugae. Food Chemistry, 65(3), 375-37.
CAPTCHA Image