با همکاری انجمن علوم و صنایع غذایی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی لاتین

نویسنده

دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری

چکیده

در سال‌های اخیر، پلاسمای سرد یکی از جایگزین‌های مورد انتظار برای تیمارهای پس از برداشت محصولات هستند. در این مطالعه، یک سیستم تخلیه سطحی برای جستجوی زمان نابودی باسیلوس سرئوس، باسیوس کوآگولانس، باسیلوس اسئاروترموفیلوس و کلستریدیوم بوتولینیوم در شیر بطری شده استفاده شد. شبیه‌سازی توسط نرم‌افزار COMSOL ورژن a5/3 برای یک هندسه دو بعدی اجرا شد. داده‌های آزمایشی جمع‌آوری شده در نرم‌افزار شبیه‌سازی شدند. فاکتور k  حاصل از داده‌های غیرفعال‌سازی میکروارگانیسم برای تأیید داده‌های شبیه‌سازی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان دادند تولید گونه‌های فعال اکسیژن طی تیمار پلاسمای سرد، با افزایش زمان افزایش می‌یابد و در کل ظرف پخش می‌شود. غلظت این گونه‌ها در ابتدای تولید یعنی در لحظه خروج از پروب پلاسما، بالا بوده و در انتها که سطح آزاد شیر را ترک می‌کنند، کاهش می‌یابد. با افزایش دمای اولیه نمونه شیر از 50 به 80 درجه سانتی‌گراد، می‌توان تغییرات بارزی در مقدار ازون مشاهده کرد. اما تغییرات ولتاژ در این دو دما اثر بارزی بر غلظت ازون نداشت. همچنین بلافاصله با آغاز تیمار پلاسما، تولید پلاسما نیز آغاز شده و میزان غلظت گونه‌های فعال در آن لحظه بیشترین مقدار است. نشان داده شده است که در بین چهار باکتری مورد مطالعه، باسیلوس استئاروترموفیلوس بیشترین مقاومت را در برابر پلاسمای سرد داشته و باکتری‌های دیگر بعد از آن قرار می‌گیرند. در نهایت می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که تیمار پلاسما در عمق بطری، این امکان را ایجاد می‌کند که محدودیت کاربرد سطحی تیمار پلاسمای سرد رفع شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Numerical calculation of the lethality of becteria in bottled milk under cold plasma treatment

نویسنده [English]

  • Azadeh Ranjbar Nedamani

Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University

چکیده [English]

In recent years, cold plasma is one of the expected alternatives for post-harvest treatments and post-harvest management of products. A surface discharge plasma system was used for investigating the destruction time of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus stearothermophilus, and Clostridium botulinum in bottled milk. The simulation was performed by COMSOL a3.5 software for a two-dimensional geometry. The collected experimental data were simulated in COMSOL software. The k factor of microorganism deactivation data was used to validate the simulated data. Results showed that the production of reactive oxygen species during plasma treatment increases with time and extends to the entire container. The concentration of reactive oxygen species (at the output of the plasma probe) at the beginning of the production was high, and at the end when they leave the free surface of the milk, the concentration decreased. Increasing the initial temperature of milk sample, from 50 to 80℃, can cause significant changes in the amount of ozone from 125 mol/m3 to 266 mol/m3, respectively (p <0.05). However, voltage changes in these two temperatures did not show a significant effect on ozone concentration. Also, immediately upon the initiation of plasma treatment, plasma destruction begins where the concentration of active species is higher. It is shown that among the four studied bacteria, Bacillus stearothermophilus has the highest resistance against cold plasma, and after that other bacteria have shown similar resistance. Finally, it can be concluded that the deep plasma treatment in bottle can make it possible to overcome the surface limitation of cold plasma treatment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cold plasma
  • Milk
  • Sterilization
  • Pasteurization
  1. Aslan, Y. (2016). The effect of dielectric barrier discharge plasma treatment on the microorganisms found in raw cow’s milk. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(2), 169-173. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.34744
  2. Bahreini, M., Anvar, S. A., Nowruzi, B., & Sari, A. H. (2021). Effects of the cold atmospheric plasma treatment technology on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli populations in raw milk. Journal of Nutrition, Fasting and Health, 9(4 (Spe), 296-305.
  3. Bakshi, A., & Smith, D. (1984). Effect of fat content and temperature on viscosity in relation to pumping requirements of fluid milk products. Journal of Dairy Science, 67(6), 1157-1160. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81417-4
  4. Balthazar, C., Pimentel, T., Ferrão, L., Almada, C., Santillo, A., Albenzio, M., Mollakhalili, N., Mortazavian, A., Nascimento, J. S., & Silva, M. (2017). Sheep milk: physicochemical characteristics and relevance for functional food development. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 16(2), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12250
  5. Dash, S., & Jaganmohan, R. (2022). Stability and shelf-life of plasma bubbling treated cow milk. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.18.480824
  6. De Jong, P. (2008). Thermal processing of milk. Advanced dairy science and technology, 1-34.
  7. Eazhumalai, G., Ranjitha Gracy, T., Mishra, A., & Annapure, U. S. (2021). Atmospheric pressure nonthermal pin to plate plasma system for the microbial decontamination of oat milk. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, e16181. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.16181
  8. Farrell Jr, H., Wickham, E., Unruh, J., Qi, P., & Hoagland, P. (2001). Secondary structural studies of bovine caseins: temperature dependence of β-casein structure as analyzed by circular dichroism and FTIR spectroscopy and correlation with micellization. Food Hydrocolloids, 15(4-6), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(01)00080-7
  9. Ghanem, T. (2010). Dielectric properties of liquid foods affected by moisture contents and temperatures. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 27(2), 688-698. 21608/mjae.2010.105937
  10. Gurol, C., Ekinci, F., Aslan, N., & Korachi, M. (2012). Low temperature plasma for decontamination of coli in milk. International journal of food microbiology, 157(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.02.016
  11. Ibarz, A., & Barbosa-Cánovas, G. V. (2002). Unit operations in food engineering. CRC press. 491- 500.
  12. Jiang, Y., Zhang, L., Wen, D., & Ding, Y. (2016). Role of physical and chemical interactions in the antibacterial behavior of ZnO nanoparticles against coli. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 69, 1361-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.044
  13. Kim, H.-H., & Jiménez-Flores, R. (1995). Heat-induced interactions between the proteins of milk fat globule membrane and skim milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 78(1), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76612-7
  14. Kim, H.-J., Yong, H. I., Park, S., Kim, K., Choe, W., & Jo, C. (2015). Microbial safety and quality attributes of milk following treatment with atmospheric pressure encapsulated dielectric barrier discharge plasma. Food Control, 47, 451-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.07.053
  15. Liao, X., Liu, D., Xiang, Q., Ahn, J., Chen, S., Ye, X., & Ding, T. (2017). Inactivation mechanisms of non-thermal plasma on microbes: A review. Food Control, 75, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.12.021
  16. Liao, X., Su, Y., Liu, D., Chen, S., Hu, Y., Ye, X., Wang, J., & Ding, T. (2018). Application of atmospheric cold plasma-activated water (PAW) ice for preservation of shrimps (Metapenaeus ensis). Food Control, 94, 307-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.07.026
  17. Misnal, M. F. I., Redzuan, N., Zainal, M. N. F., Ahmad, N., Ibrahim, R. K. R., & Agun, L. (2022). Cold plasma: A potential alternative for rice grain postharvest treatment management in Malaysia. Rice Science, 29(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2021.12.001
  18. Nishime, T., Borges, A., Koga-Ito, C., Machida, M., Hein, L., & Kostov, K. (2017). Non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma jet applied to inactivation of different microorganisms. Surface and Coatings Technology, 312, 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.07.076
  19. Niveditha, A., Pandiselvam, R., Prasath, V. A., Singh, S. K., Gul, K., & Kothakota, A. (2021). Application of cold plasma and ozone technology for decontamination of Escherichia coli in foods-a review. Food Control, 130, 108338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108338
  20. Ranjbar Nedamani, A. (2022). Finding Effective Plasma Process Factors on Yeast Deactivation by Numerical Simulation and RSM. Iranian Food Science and Technology Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.22067/ifstrj.2022.75558.1152
  21. Ranjbar Nedamani, A., & Hashemi, S. J. (2022). Energy consumption computing of cold plasma‐assisted drying of apple slices (Yellow Delicious) by numerical simulation. Journal of Food Process Engineering, e14019. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.14019
  22. Schlüter, O., & Fröhling, A. (2014). Non-thermal processing cold plasma for bioefficient food processing. 948-953.
  23. Sharma, S., & Singh, R. K. (2022). Effect of atmospheric pressure cold plasma treatment time and composition of feed gas on properties of skim milk. LWT, 154, 112747. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112747
  24. Soni, A., Choi, J., & Brightwell, G. (2021). Plasma-activated water (paw) as a disinfection technology for bacterial inactivation with a focus on fruit and vegetables. Foods, 10(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010166
  25. Surowsky, B., Fischer, A., Schlueter, O., & Knorr, D. (2013). Cold plasma effects on enzyme activity in a model food system. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 19, 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2013.04.002
  26. Surowsky, B., Schlüter, O., & Knorr, D. (2014). Interactions of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma with solid and liquid food systems: A Review. Food Engineering Reviews, 7(2), 82-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-014-9088-5
  27. Tabibian, S. (2019). Experimental study and CFD modeling of fluidized-bed reactors combined with atmospheric-pressure plasma jets for surface treatment of particles, Sorbonne Université.
  28. Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Yang, H., & Zhu, X. (2020). Gas phase surface discharge plasma model for yeast inactivation in water. Journal of Food Engineering, 286, 110117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110117
  29. Wu, X., Luo, Y., Zhao, F., & Mu, G. (2021). Influence of dielectric barrier discharge cold plasma on physicochemical property of milk for sterilization. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 18(1), 1900219. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.201900219
CAPTCHA Image