Evaluation the Performance of Drying Efficiency and Energy Efficiency of a Solar Dryer Quipped with Phase Change Materials and Air Recirculation System

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Mohaddese Ahmadi ¹
• Hadi Samimi Akhijahani ¹
• Payman Salami ²

¹ Department of Bio Systems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

² Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/ifstrj.2023.79695.1218

Abstract

Introduction
Solar energy is one of the sources of renewable energy that can be used in both buildings, industry and agriculture in the form of heat or electrical energy. According to previous researches, energy consumption in the world is doubling every 20 years. However, the use of renewable energy is still less than fossil fuels, which has caused environmental problems in the world. In recent decades, the tendency to use renewable energy, especially solar energy, has increased. A significant portion of the world's energy (about 30%) is spent on agriculture, and about 3.62% is used to dry agricultural products (Iranmanesh et al., 2020). However, thermal and drying efficiency of the solar collectors are not in acceptable range. Applying different ways to improve the performance of solar dryers such as using thermal energy storage system, air recirculation mechanism and using desiccant system. In this paper, phase change materials were placed vertically in consecutive rows at different distances inside the collector and the thermal performance of the collector was investigated. Also, the drying process of Oleaster were evaluated using PCM and air recirculation system.
 
Materials and Methods
The indirect solar dryer used in this study includes the chassis, flat plate collector, electric fan, drying cabinet, pipes containing PCM and sensors. 25 copper tubes containing PCM are placed on the absorber plate with fixed intervals. The insulated cabinet of the dryer has three trays. A 220 volt 60 W electric fan is placed in the inlet of the collector and causes to flow air inside the system. The process of drying Oleaster in a solar dryer was carried out for 9 consecutive days in August 1401. The drying process was performed at three positions of PCM pipes at 5, 10 and 15 cm intervals with air flow rate of 0.5, 1 and 2 m/s. The drying kinetics of Oleaster was investigated using five mathematical models considering drying time and related constants. The selected model is selected based on the degree of fit (the highest R² and the lowest RMSE) on the experimental data. Thermal efficiency was calculated according to ASHRAE standard 2003 (Eltawil et al., 2018). Moreover, to determine the drying efficiency the amount of energy required to heat the dryer and the product and extract water from the Oleaster and the total energy (electrical and thermal) input to the dryer was considered. SCE is defined as the energy required to dry one kilogram of the product.
 
Results and Discussion
The drying time of the product by the dryer is reduced from 2.09 to 4.16% on average by changing the position of PCM from 5 cm to 15 cm. On the other hand, with the increase of air velocity from 0.5 to 2 m/s, the drying time decreased from 8.32% to 16.64%. Henderson and Pabis model was the best model to describe and define the drying process of Oleaster with solar dryer. The curves of the drying rate against the time in different conditions illustrated that in the initial stage of drying of samples. The amount of moisture evaporation is high due to the high water content in Oleaster, and a major part of the drying process took place in this period. The value of SEC for the dryer without PCM was 4.26 MJ/kg, while for the case with PCM, it was 2.04 MJ/kg with a distance of 15 cm. By increasing the distance between the tubes, the drying efficiency increases due to the reduction of drying time and energy consumption. In this case, the consumption of electrical energy by the fan (for fluid flow in the dryer and collector) and the thermal energy input to the dryer are reduced. However, with the increase of air speed from 1 m/s to m/s², there is a significant reduction in drying efficiency. The highest drying efficiency was 36.72% and the lowest was 25.65% for distance 15 cm, air velocity of 1 m/s and distance 5 cm, air speed 2 m/s, respectively. Drying efficiency was improved by at least 12% using PCM.
 
Conclusion
In this research, the analysis of the thermal process in the solar dryer system in three positions of the tubes containing PCM inside the flat plate collector for the distances of 5, 10 and 15 cm between the tubes at three air velocities of 0.5, 1 and 2 m/s was investigated. Using the return flow system and the phase changing material at the same time improved the thermal efficiency of the flat plate collector by 19.12%.

Keywords

• Oleaster
• Phase change materials
• Recirculation system
• Thermal efficiency

Main Subjects

• Food Engineering

©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

1. Aghbashlo, M., Kianmehr, H., & Samimi-Akhijahani H. (2008). Influence of drying conditions on the effective moisture diffusivity, energy of activation and energy consumption during the thin-layer drying of beriberi fruit (Berberidaceae). Energy Conversion Management, 49, 2865–2871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.03.009
2. Akbolat, D., Ertekin, C., Menges, H.O., Guzel, E., & Ekinci, K. (2008). Physical and nutritional properties of oleaster growing in Turkey. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 20, 2358-2366.
3. Antal, T., Tarek, M., Tarek-Tilistyak, J., & Kerekes, B. (2016). Comparative effects of three different drying methods on drying kinetics and quality of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 41(3), 2374-2385. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12971
4. Atalay, H. (2020). Assessment of energy and cost analysis of packed bed and phase change material thermal energy storage systems for solar energy-assisted drying process. Solar Energy, 198, 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.01.051
5. Babar, O., Arora, A.K., Nema, P.K., & Kasara, A. (2021). Effect of PCM assisted flat plate collector solar drying of green chili on retention of bioactive compounds and control of aflatoxins development. Solar Energy, 229, 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.07.077
6. Barghi, M.S., Iranmanesh, M., & Samimi-Akhijahani, H. (2022). Thermo-economic analysis of solar drying of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) integrated with evacuated tube solar collector and phase change material. Journal of Energy Storage, 52, 104688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104688
7. Bhardwaj, A.K., Kumar, R., Chauhan, R., & Kumar, S. (2020). Experimental investigation and performance evaluation of a novel solar dryer integrated with a combination of SHS and PCM for drying chilli in the Himalayan region. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 20, 100713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100713
8. Blanco-Cano, L., Soria-Verdugo, A., Garcia-Gutierrez, L.M., & Ruiz-Rivas, U. (2016). Modeling the thin-layer drying process of Granny Smith apples: Application in an indirect solar dryer. Applied Thermal Engineering, 108, 1086-1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.001
9. Boudraa, S. (2020). Impact of microwave-grill-drying (MWGD) on functional properties of berry Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Journal of Bioenergy and Food Science, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.18067/jbfs.v7i1.275
10. Chamoli, S., Chauhan, R., Thakur, N.S., & Saini, J.S. (2012). A review of the performance of double pass solar air heater. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.012
11. Dorouzi, M., Mortezapour, H., & Akhavan, H.R. (2018). Tomato slices drying in a desiccant-assisted solar dryer coupled with a photovoltaic-thermal regeneration system. Solar Energy, 162, 364-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.025
12. Ebrahimi, H., Samimi Akhijahani, H., & Salami, P. (2021). Improving the thermal efficiency of a solar dryer using phase change materials at different position in the collector. Solar Energy, 220, 535-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.03.054
13. El Khadraoui, A., Bouadila, S., Kooli, S., Farhat, A., & Guizani, A. (2017). Thermal behavior of indirect solar dryer: Nocturnal usage of solar air with PCM. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.149
14. Eltawil, M., Mostafa, A., Azam, M., & Alghannam, A.O. (2018). Solar PV powered mixed-mode tunnel dryer for drying potato chips. Renewable Energy, 116, 594-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.007
15. Esakkimuthu, S., Hassabou, A.H., Palaniappan, C., Spinnler, M., Blumenberg, & Velraj, R. (2013). Experimental investigation on phase change material based thermal storage system for solar air heating applications. Solar Energy, 88, 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.11.006
16. Gertzos, K.P., & Caouris, Y.G. (2007). Experimental and computational study of the developed flow field in a flat plate integrated collector storage (ICS) solar device with recirculation, Exp. Thermal Fluid Science, 31(8), 1133–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2006.12.002
17. Goyal, R.K., Tiwari, G.N., & Garg, H.P. (1998). Effect of thermal storage on the performance of an air collector: a periodic analysis. Energy Conversion Management, 39, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(96)00226-9
18. Hamidpour, R., Hamidpour, S., Hamidpour, M., Shahlari, M., Sohraby, M., Shahlari, N., & Hamidpour, R. (2017). Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia): From a variety of traditional medicinal applications to its novel roles as active antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-mutagenic and analgesic agent. Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine, 7(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2015.09.004
19. Iranmanesh, M., Samimi-Akhijahani, H., & Jahromi, M.S.B. (2020). CFD modeling and evaluation the performance of a solar cabinet dryer equipped with evacuated tube solar collector and thermal storage system. Renewable Energy, 145, 1192-1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.038
20. Kalogirou, S.A. (2006). Prediction of flat-plate collector performance parameters using artificial neural networks. Solar Energy, 80(3), 248-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2005.03.003
21. Koca, A., Oztopb, H.F., Koyunc, T., & Varol, Y. (2008). Energy and exergy analysis of a latent heat storage system with phase change material for a solar collector. Renewable Energy, 33, 567–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.03.012
22. Motahayyer, M., Arabhosseini, A., & Samimi-Akhijahani, H. (2019). Evaluation of solar cabinet dryer equipped heat exchanger and porous plate. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 50, 305-318. https://22059/IJBSE.2019.264036.665085
23. Raj, A.K., Srinivas, M., & Jayaraj, S. (2019). A cost-effective method to improve the performance of solar air heaters using discrete macro-encapsulated PCM capsules for drying applications. Applied Thermal Engineering, 146, 910-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.10.055
24. Rashidi, S., Kashefi, M.H., & Hormozi, F. (2018). Potential applications of inserts in solar thermal energy systems – a review to identify the gaps and frontier challenges. Solar Energy, 171, 929–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.07.017
25. Rashidi, M., Arabhosseini, A., Samimi-Akhijahani, H., & Kermani, A.M. (2021). Acceleration the drying process of oleaster (Elaeagnus angustifolia) using reflectors and desiccant system in a solar drying system. Renewable Energy, 171, 526-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.094
26. Sahan, Y., Gocmen, D., Cansev, A., Celik, G., Aydin, E., Dunda, N.A., Dugler, D., Kaplan, H.B., Kilci, A., & Guncer, S. (2015). Chemical and techno-functional properties of fours from peeled and unpeeled oleaster (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 88, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2015.088.007
27. Salami, P. (2016). Design and construction of the PVT system to increase the energy efficiency of solar flat plate collector. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
28. Serale, G., Goia, F., & Perino, M. (2016). Numerical model and simulation of a solar thermal collector with slurry Phase Change Material (PCM) as the heat transfer fluid. Solar Energy, 134, 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.04.030
29. Toğrul, I.T., & Pehlivan, D. (2002). Mathematical modeling of solar drying of apricots in thin layers. Journal of Food Engineering, 55(3), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00065-1
30. Tyagi, V.V., Panwar, N.L., Rahim, N.A., & Kothari, R. (2012). Review on solar air heating system with and without thermal storage system. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4), 2289-2303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.005
31. Wang, Y., Xu, J., Liu, Q., Chen, Y., & Liu, H. (2016). Performance analysis of a parabolic trough solar collector using Al₂O₃/synthetic oil nanofluid. Applied Thermal Engineering, 107, 469–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.170
32. Yadav, C.O., & Ramana, P.V. (2020). Experimental investigation of the solar dryer using phase-change material. Renewable Energy and Climate Change, 161, 185-197. https://doi.org/1007/978-981-32-9578-0.17