Evaluation of lactic acid on textural characteristics and proteolytic pattern of biceps femoris muscle of camel

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Mahsan Irajifar ¹
• Mohammad Javad Varidi ¹
• Mehdi Varidi ¹
• Younes Zahedi ²

¹ Department of Food Science and Technology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

² Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and natural resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22067/ifstrj.v0i0.64625

Abstract

Introduction: Camel carcasses has lower fat content in comparison with cow, moreover, camel meat has relatively higher polyunsaturated fatty acids and lower cholesterol contents (Kadim et al., 2009a & 2006). However, calcium amount of camel meat is greater than that of cow, and its lower consumption is partly related to this issue. With increasing demand of camel meat, more attention has been paid to the quality and chemical composition of it. Acid marinade can be used through the diffusion of the solution and its propagation over time as an extensive method to improve the meat tenderness (Yusop et al., 2010). Lactic acid is often used in the meat industry as an antimicrobial during carcass slaughter. In addition, lactic acid can improve meat tenderness (Hinkle et al., 2010). The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of lactic acid and sodium chloride on textural and sensory properties, also and proteolysis pattern of biceps femoris muscle of camel.
 
Materials and Methods: Six 4 to 7 years old camels were transported to the slaughterhouse in Mashhad (Iran). Slaughtering and dressing of camels were carried out according to Islamic methods. All chemicals and reagents in the experiments were of analytical grade and purchased from Merck and Sigma-Aldrich companies. Biceps femoris muscle was used as an experimental material, cutting into 2×2×5 cm3 pieces, and laid in lactic acid solutions (0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5% v/v, all accompanied with 2% w/v NaCl) at a ratio of 1 to 4 (meat  to marination solution) within plastic bags. Marination process was carried out for 0, 24, 48, 72 h at 4 °C. The meats were then removed from the marinade and dried lightly. After that, moisture, ash, protein and fat contents of the meat were specified by AOAC (2002). Shear force was measured by TA.XT plus texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, UK) provided with a Warner-Bratzler shear force blade method in order to evaluation of meat tenderness (Byrne et al., 2000). Myofibrillar fragmentation index (MFI) was determined as described by zahedi et al. (1393). Sarcomere length was measured with the method of Botha et al. (2007). One-dimensional gel electrophoresis was determined as described by zahedi et al. (1393). Collagen content was specified by AOAC (1993). Sensory properties including color, texture, flavor, juiciness and overall acceptance were performed using a 5-point structured hedonic scale (Hoffman et al., 2006 & 2008). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significant differences between treatments using SPSS software (version 19). Duncan’s multiple range test was used to compare the means.
 
Results and discussion: Acid concentration and marination time had a significant effect (p <0.05) on sarcomere length. It was likely due to the fact that the addition of acid led to increase in pure positive charges on myofibrils and cytoskeletal proteins. As a result, more repulsive forces were generated between the protein molecules of myofibrils. Eventually, myofibrils swelling caused distancing Z lines from one another, and increasing the sarcomere length (Ke et al., 2008). The results of analysis of variance showed that the concentration of lactic acid had a significant effect on MFI (p<0.05), and MFI value was less than zero at 0% concentration, however, it was non-significant in relation to the time (p> 0.05). The higher MFI values of the marinated samples may be due to the proteolysis of myofibrile proteins using D-cathepsins which activated at acidic pH (range 3-6).  Meat samples marinated in the highest concentration for 72 h showed the lowest WBSF (p<0.05). The tenderising mechanism of acid marinades was believed to be including weakening of structures due to swelling of meat, increasing proteolysis by cathepsins, and conversion of collagen to gelatin at low pH during cooking (Berge et al., 2001; Offer & Knight, 1988). The retention time and acid concentration did not have a significant effect (p> 0.05) on the collagen amount of lactic acid treated samples. It was likely that low acid concentration, although affecting some of the parameters, is not suitable for degradation of connective tissue (Hinkle et al., 2010). Sensory analysis showed that tenderness of the samples marinated at with 1.5% acid received the highest score (p<0.05), which was consistent with the instrumental results. Acid concentration significantly affected (p<0.05) total acceptance of the samples. Higher levels of acid can be used for marinating without adversely affecting the consumer acceptance. Results from SDS-PAGE showed that number of seven bands on gels, on average, were belonged to intact proteins, and other bands were considered as peptides which resulted from proteins proteolysis, especially heavy proteins. Also, time had non-significant effect on band area of myosin heavy chain (p>0.05), while, acid concentration had a significant effect on the area of ​​this protein (p<0.05). The band area of proteins C, α-actinin and actin proteins enhanced as a function of acid concentration and marination time (p<0.05).
In conclusion, we can claim that lactic acid and sodium chloride can be used as an effective acidic marination to improve biceps femoris muscle of camel meat. This method can be advice as a trick for tenderizing camel meat in household consumptions, restaurants and also meat industry, thereby increasing demand for camel meat in order to gain further healthy benefits of it.

Keywords

• lactic acid
• Biceps Femoris
• ,camel

References

1. AOAC, 1993. official method 990.26 Hydroxyproline in meat and meat products
2. AOAC. (2002). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
3. Asghar, A. and Bhatti, A.R., 1988. Endogenous proteolytic enzymes in skeletal muscle: their significance in muscle physiology and during postmortem aging events in carcasses. Advances in food research, 31, pp.343-451.
4. Bandman, E., & Zdanis, D. 1988. An immunological method to assess protein degradation in post-mortem muscle. Meat Science, 22(1): 1-19.
5. Berge, P., Ertbjerg, P., Larsen, L. M., Astruc, T., Vignon, X., & Møller, A. J. 2001. Tenderization of beef by lactic acid injected at different times post mortem. Meat Science, 57(4): 347-357.
6. Botha, S. S. C., Hoffman, L., & Britz, T. 2007. Physical meat quality characteristics of hot-deboned ostrich (Struthio camelus var. domesticus) Muscularis gastrocnemius, pars interna during post-mortem aging. Meat Science, 75(4): 709-718.
7. Burke, R., & Monahan, F. 2003. The tenderisation of shin beef using a citrus juice marinade. Meat Science, 63(2): 161-168.
8. Byrne, C., Troy, D., & Buckley, D. 2000. Postmortem changes in muscle electrical properties of bovine M. longissimus dorsi and their relationship to meat quality attributes and pH fall. Meat Science, 54(1): 23-34.
9. Claeys, E., Uytterhaegen, L., Buts, B., & Demeyer, D. 1995. Quantification of beef myofibrillar proteins by SDS-PAGE. Meat Science, 39(2): 177-193.
10. Claeys, E., Uytterhaegen, L., Buts, B., and Demeyer, D. 1995. Quantification of beef myofibrillar proteins by SDS-PAGE. Meat Science, 39: 177-193
11. Culler, R., Smith, G., & Cross, H. 1978. Relationship of myofibril fragmentation index to certain chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of bovine longissimus muscle. Journal of food Science, 43(4): 1177-1180.
12. Desmond, E., & Troy, D. 2001. Effect of lactic and citric acid on low-value beef used for emulsion-type meat products. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 34(6): 374-379.
13. Ertbjerg, P., Mielche, M. M., Larsen, L. M., & Moller, A. 1999. Relationship between proteolytic changes and tenderness in prerigor lactic acid marinated beef. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 79(7), 970-978.
14. Faye, B. and Bonnet, P., 2012. Camel sciences and economy in the world: current situation and perspectives. In Proc. 3rd ISOCARD conference. Keynote presentations. 29th January-1st February (pp. 2-15).
15. Goll, D.E., Otsuka, Y., Nagainis, P.A., Shannon, J.D., Sathe, S.K., and Muguruma, M. 1983. Role of muscle proteinases in maintenance of muscle integrity and mass. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 7: 137-177.
16. Hamm, R. 1975. Water-holding capacity of meat. In: Meat (D. J. A., Cole, & R. A., Lawrie, eds). Buttersworth Publishers, London, 321-337.
17. Hinkle, J.B., 2010. Acid marination for tenderness enhancement of beef bottom round. Theses and Dissertations in Animal Science, p.12.
18. Hoffman, L. C., Botha, S. C., &Britz, T. J. 2006. Sensory properties of hot-deboned ostrich muscularisgastrocnemius, pars interna. Meat Science, 72: 734- 740.
19. Hoffman, L. C., Muller, M., Cloete, S. W. P., & Brand, M. 2008. Physical and sensory meat quality of South African black ostriches (Struthiocamelusvar. domesticus), Zimbabwean blue ostriches (Struthiocamelusvar. australis) and their hybrid. Meat Science, 79: 365- 374
20. Hosseini, S.E., 2015. The effect of meat marinating with lactic and citric acid on some physicochemical and electrophoretic pattern of beef burger. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 9(2), pp.103-108.
21. Huff-Lonergan, E., Zhang, W., and Lonergan, S.M. 2010. Biochemistry of postmortem muscle - Lessons on mechanisms of meat tenderization. Meat Science, 86: 184-195.
22. Hwan, S., and Bandman, E. 1989. Studies of Desmin and α-Actinin Degradation in Bovine Semitendinosus Muscle. Journal of Food Science, 54: 1426-1430.
23. Istrati, D., Ciuciu, A.M.S., Ionescu, A., Vizireanu, C. and Dinica, R., 2012. Influence of spice and wine based marinades on bovine Biceps femoris muscle tenderness. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(79), pp.14461-14467.
24. Kadim, I.T., Al-Hosni, Y., Mahgoub, O., Al-Marzooqi, W., Khalaf, S.K., Al-Maqbaly, R.S., Al-Sinawi, S.S.H. and Al-Amri, I.S., 2009. Effect of low voltage electrical stimulation on biochemical and quality characteristics of Longissimus thoracis muscle from one-humped Camel (Camelus dromedaries). Meat science, 82(1), pp.77-85.
25. Kadim, I.T., Mahgoub, O., Al-Marzooqi, W., Al-Zadjali, S., Annamalai, K. and Mansour, M.H., 2006. Effects of age on composition and quality of muscle Longissimus thoracis of the Omani Arabian camel (Camelus dromedaries). Meat Science, 73(4), pp.619-625.
26. Ke, S., Huang, Y., Decker, E. A., & Hultin, H. O. 2009. Impact of citric acid on the tenderness, microstructure and oxidative stability of beef muscle. Meat Science, 82(1): 113-118.
27. Kemp, C.M., Sensky, P.L., Bardsley, R.G., Buttery, P.J., and Parr, T. 2010. Tenderness: An enzymatic view. Meat Science, 84: 248-256
28. Kim, H.W., Choi, Y.S., Choi, J.H., Kim, H.Y., Lee, M.A., Hwang, K.E., Song, D.H., Lim, Y.B. and Kim, C.J., 2013. Tenderization effect of soy sauce on beef M. biceps femoris. Food chemistry, 139(1), pp.597-603.
29. Klinhom, P., Klinhom, J., Senapa, J. and Methawiwat, S., 2011. Influence of citric acid,
30. Klinhom, P., Klinhom, J., Senapa, J. and Methawiwat, S., 2011. Influence of citric acid, lemon and porcupine fruit juice on the tenderness and sensory properties of bovine meat. In Proceedings of the 49th Kasetsart University Annual Conference, Kasetsart University, Thailand, 1-4 February, 2011. Volume 4. Subject: Agricultural Extension and Home Economics (pp. 1-10). Kasetsart University.
31. Knöll, R., Hoshijima, M., and Chien, K.R. 2002. Z-line proteins: implications for additional functions. European Heart Journal Supplements, 4: I13-I17.
32. Koohmaraie, M. 1994. Muscle proteinases and meat aging. Meat Science, 36(1): 93-104.
33. Laemmli, U.K. 1970. Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227: 680-685.
34. Offer, G., & Knight, P., 1988. The structural basis of water-holding in meat part 2: Drip losses. In R. Lawrie (Ed.). Developments in meat science, Volume 4: 172-243. London, Elsevier Science.
35. Olson, D. G., Parrish, F. C. Jr., & Stromer, M. H. 1976. Myofibril fragmentation and shear resistance of three bovine muscles during postmortem storage. Journal of food Science, 41(5): 1036-1041
36. Oreskovich, D., Bechtel, P., McKeith, F., Novakofski, J., & Basgall, E. 1992. Marinade pH affects textural properties of beef. Journal of food Science, 57(2): 305-311.
37. Penny, I.F., and Ferguson-Pryce, R. 1979. Measurement of autolysis in beef muscle homogenates. Meat Science, 3: 121-134.
38. Rao, M., Gault, N., & Kennedy, S. 1989. Variations in water-holding capacity due to changes in the fibre diameter, sarcomere length and connective tissue morphology of some beef muscles under acidic conditions below the ultimate pH. Meat Science, 26(1): 19-37.
39. Sabzi.F,1394. the effect of verjuice on the physicochemical, textural of Biceps femoris muscle on beef. M.Sc Dissertation Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Faculty of Agriculture.
40. Saunders, A.B., 1994. The effect of acidification on myofibrillar proteins. Meat science, 37(2), pp.271-280.
41. Sawdy, J.C., Kaiser, S.A., St-Pierre, N.R., and Wick, M.P. 2004. Myofibrillar 1-D fingerprints and myosin heavy chain MS analyses of beef loin at 36 h postmortem correlate with tenderness at 7 days. Meat Science, 67: 421-426.
42. Sentandreu, M. A., Coulis, G., & Ouali, A. 2002. Role of muscle endopeptidases and their inhibitors in meat tenderness. Trends in food Science and Technology, 13: 400-421.
43. Solatznizade,N and Kadivar,M.1390. Chemistry &Technology of meat& meat product. Publishing center Isfahan university of echnology.Isfahan
44. Taylor, R. G., Geesink, G., Thompson, V., Koohmaraie, M., & Goll, D. 1995. Is Z-disk degradation responsible for postmortem tenderization? Journal of animal science, 73(5): 1351-1367.
45. Wheeler, T.L., Shackelford, S.D. and Koohmaraie, M., 2000. Variation in proteolysis, sarcomere length, collagen content, and tenderness among major pork muscles. Journal of Animal Science, 78(4), pp.958-965.
46. Yates, L. D., Greaser, M. L., & Huxley, H. 1983. Quatitative determination of myosin and actin in rabbit skeletal muscle. Journal of molecular biology, 168(1): 123-141.
47. Yusop, S. M., O’Sullivan, M. G., Kerry, J. F., & Kerry, J. P. 2010. Effect of marinating time and low pH on marinade performance and sensory acceptability of poultry meat. Meat Science,
48. Zahedi,Y.1393. Investigation into relationship between proteum changes and some quality properties on Iranian one-humped camel. ph.D Dissertation Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Faculty of Agriculture