Quantitative evaluation of amino acids and fatty acids profiles of biosilage produced from chicken waste

Document Type : Full Research Paper

Authors

• Reza Safari ¹
• Seyed Vali Hosseini ²
• Sharareh Firouzkandian ³
• Soheyl Reyhani Poul ⁴
• Mona Zamani ⁵

¹ Caspian Sea Ecology Research Institute, Fisheries Science Research Institute, Agricultural Education and Extension Research Organization, Sari, Iran

² Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

³ . Caspian Sea Ecology Research Institute, Fisheries Science Research Institute, Agricultural Education and Extension Research Organization, Sari, Iran

⁴ Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Faculty of Fisheries and Environment, Gorgan, Iran

⁵ General Department of Fisheries of Mazandaran Province, Babolsar, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/ifstrj.2021.71188.1067

Abstract

[1]Introduction: One way to turn chicken waste into high value-added product is to produce fermented silage (biosilage). This product is superior to fish powder due to its characteristics such as high quality protein, probiotic bacteria and low price and can be considered as a suitable alternative for feed industry. Silage can be produced from protein wastes by both acidic and biological methods. The acidic method of producing silage (acidic silage) uses a variety of organic and inorganic acids such as formic acid and sulfuric acid. In the production of biological silage, two methods of autolysis (using internal enzymes) and fermentation (using microbial starters) are used. Starters used for inoculation are mainly from the group of lactic acid bacteria. To produce silage, protein wastes are used, especially fish wastes. Since poultry waste has not been used for biosilage production in the country so far, the aim of the present study is to produce biological silage from chicken waste and evaluate the profile of amino acids and fatty acids in the biosilage.
 
Materials and methods: Chicken intestine was prepared from meat production complex in Golestan province, Kordkoy city and also Simin Naz poultry industrial slaughterhouse in Sari and was transferred to the processing pilot of Caspian Sea Ecology Research Institute in the shortest time in cold container. During the biosilage production process, protein-degrading bacteria (containing protease enzymes such as gram-positive sporulated bacteria) and acid-producing bacteria (to reduce the pH of the suspension and accelerate the fermentation process, such as lactic acid bacteria) were used as initiator bacteria or microbial starters for intestinal digestion. The product was analyzed for protein, fat, moisture and ash according to standard methods. In this study, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of Cecil model (Seri 200) was used for amino acids analysis. Samples were prepared for assaying amino acids profile in two stages including hydrolysis and derivatization and the results were expressed in grams per 100 grams of substrate. To determine the fatty acids composition of the biosilage sample, the fat was first extracted. In order to evaluate the profile of fatty acids, a Shimadzu model gas chromatography device was used and the results were expressed as a percentage.
 
Results and discussion: The product produced contained about 60% protein and 21% fat. According to the results, the total of essential amino acids in the produced biosilage was 24.416, the total of non-essential amino acids was 30.959 and the total of essential and non-essential amino acids was 55.375 g per 100 g of substrate. Among essential
amino acids, the highest amount belonged to the amino acids leucine (7.334±0.45 g/100g) and valine (4.71±0.27 g/100g) and among non-essential amino acids, the highest amount belonged to glutamic acid (10.6±0.73 g/100g) and alanine (5.864±0.81 g/100g). It was also found that all essential amino acids except tryptophan are present in biosilage. Evaluation of biosilage fatty acids profile revealed that the total amount of saturated fatty acids (SFA) was 33.57%, monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) was 41.17% and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) was 24.36%. It was further found that in biosilage the total omega 3 was 2.07%, the total omega 6 was 22.91% and the sum of EPA and DHA was 2.06%.
The profile of amino acids and fatty acids in the biosilage produced from chicken waste is almost the same as that of other products made from protein waste (such as fish meal, fish waste biosilage and hydrolyzed protein powder). This property, along with cheap production and high nutritional value, allows the use of biosilage obtained from chicken waste in the livestock, poultry and aquatics feed industry.

Keywords

• Chicken waste
• Biosilage
• Amino acids profile
• Fatty acids profile
• Fish

Main Subjects

• Food Chemistry

References

1. AOAC. (2005). Official method of Analysis. 17th Edition, Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.
2. Fallah‐Delavar, M., and Farmani, J. (2018). Recovery and characterization of enzymatic protein hydrolyzates and Fat from chicken Skin. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 95(9), 1151-1161.
3. Fernández Herrero, A., Vittone, M., and Salomone, A. (2015). Biological silage of Merluccius hubbsi. Amino acid composition, degree of hydrolysis and peptides size. Issues in Biological Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research. 3 (6), 57-62.
4. Flahatgar, F., Zakipour Rahimabadi, E., and Rostamzad, H. (2016). Fatty acid profile and oxidation stability of oil extracted from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by-product by isoelectric solubilization/precipitation. Aquatic Animals Nutrition, 2 (1), 1-14
5. ISO (2000). Animal and vegetable fats and oils- Preparation of methyl esters of fatty acids. ISO/TC 34/SC 11. 24 p.
6. Janbakhsh, S., Hosseini Shekarabi, S. P., and Shamsaie Mergan, M. (2018). Nutritional value and heavy metal content of fishmeal from the Southwest Caspian Sea. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 16(4), 307-317.
7. Moore, J. (2004). Amino acid analysis of hydrolysates (feed, fxal, etc), Michign State University, Department of Animal Sciences, Nathalie Trottiers Laboratory.
8. National standard of Iran with number 742. (2001). Meat and its products- Fat measurement- Test method. Iran Standard and Industrial Research Institute.
9. National standard of Iran with number 744. (2002). Meat and its products- Ash measurement- Test method. Iran Standard and Industrial Research Institute.
10. National standard of Iran with number 745. (1971). Meat and its products- Moisture measurement. Iran Standard and Industrial Research Institute.
11. National standard of Iran with number 924. (1993). Measurement of total protein in meat and its products. Iran Standard and Industrial Research Institute.
12. Özyurt, G., Gökdoğan, S., Şimşek, A., Yuvka, I., Ergüven, M., and Kuley Boga, E. (2016). Fatty acid composition and biogenic amines in acidified and fermented fish silage: a comparison study. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 70(1), 72-86.
13. Özyurt, G., Özkütük, A. S., Uçar, Y., Durmuş, M., and Özoğul, Y. (2018). Fatty acid composition and oxidative stability of oils recovered from acid silage and bacterial fermentation of fish (Sea bass–Dicentrarchus labrax) by‐products. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 53(5), 1255-1261.
14. Palkar, N. D., Koli, J. M., Gund, D. P., Patange, S. B., Shrangdher, S. T., Sadawarte, R. K., and Akhade, A. R. (2018). Preparation of co-dried fish silage by using fish market waste and its comparative study. International Journalof Pure and Applied Bioscience, 6(2), 1567-1577.
15. Perez, R. 2018. Fish silage for feeding livestock. FAO Fishery Report No. 560. Rome, FAO.
16. Reyhani Poul, S., Jafarpour, A., and Safari, R. (2018). Evaluation of oil fatty acid profile, functional properties and antioxidants activity of hydrolyzate produced from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) viscera by application of protamex and neutrase enzymes. Iranian Food Science and Technology Research Journal, 14 (1), 162-176.
17. Safari, (2019). Production of biosilage from rainbow trout waste. Final report. Caspian Sea Ecological Research Center.
18. Sarhadi, N., Motamedzadegan, A., Taheri, A., and Azad, M. (2012). Comparison study of the proximate composition and amino acid profile in the bones of Goldstripe sardine (Sardinella gibossa), Anchovy kilka (Clupeonella engrauliformis) and Indian anchovy (Stolephorus indicus). Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal, 21 (1), 101-112
19. Taheri, A., Abedian Kenari, A., Motamedzadegan, A., and Habibi Rezaie, M. (2012). Process optimization of poultry by-products hydrolysate production by RSM. Iranian Journal of Food Science and Industry, 34 (9), 65-76
20. Turan, H., Kaya, Y., and Erkoyuncu, İ. (2007). Protein and lipid content and fatty acid composition of anchovy meal produced in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 31(2), 113-117.
21. Vidotti, R. M., Viegas, E. M. M., and Carneiro, D. J. (2003). Amino acid composition of processed fish silage using different raw materials. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 105(1-4), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00056-7