تاثیر پری‌بیوتیک‌های اینولین و نشاسته مقاوم بر خواص رئولوژیکی خمیر نان باگت

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• ریحانه مقدسی ¹
• سارا موحد ¹
• حسین احمدی چناربن ²

¹ گروه علوم و صنایع غذایی، واحد ورامین- پیشوا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ورامین، ایران.

² گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، واحد ورامین- پیشوا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ورامین، ایران.

https://doi.org/10.22067/ifstrj.v1396i0.61764

چکیده

نان به‌عنوان یک ماده غذایی از اهمیت ویژه‌ای برخوردار است و افزودن برخی پری‌بیوتیک‌ها نظیر اینولین و نشاسته مقاوم به آن می‌تواند سبب بهبود ارتقا سلامت افراد گردد. در پژوهش حاضر، تاثیر پری‌بیوتیک‌های اینولین و نشاسته مقاوم بر خواص رئولوژیکی خمیر مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. در این راستا از سطوح 5/2 و 5 درصد اینولین و نشاسته مقاوم استفاده گردید. با توجه به نتایج، در آزمون‌های فارینوگراف خمیر، مقدار جذب آب، زمان گسترش خمیر، زمان پایداری خمیر، افزایش و درجه نرم شدن خمیر پس از 10 و 12 دقیقه کاهش یافت. همچنین بر اساس نتایج حاصل از آزمون اکستنسوگراف، میزان انرژی خمیر، مقاومت به کشش خمیر، عدد نسبت خمیر، افزایش ولی قابلیت کشش آن کاهش نشان داد. در مجموع با لحاظ نمودن نتایج حاصل از کلیه آزمایش ها، تیمار ترکیبی D8 (حاوی 5 درصد اینولین و 5 درصد نشاسته مقاوم) به‌عنوان بهترین تیمار معرفی گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• اینولین
• نشاسته مقاوم
• پری بیوتیک
• رئولوژیکی خمیر
• نان باگت

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Inulin and Resistant Starch on Rheological Properties of Baguette Dough

نویسندگان [English]

• Ryhaneh Moghaddasi ¹
• Sara Movahhed ¹
• Hossein Ahmadi Chenarbon ²

¹ Department of Food Science, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran.

² Department of Agronomy, Varamin - Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The rheological properties of a bread dough describe its behavior under different process conditions. They are also central to its formulation, optimization, quality control, and better process capacity. A number of additives can improve the rheological properties of dough and breads. Fiber-based compounds and prebiotics in addition to gluten and starch, which have a large tendency to absorb the flour water, can affect the moisture distribution across the dough structure. Inulin and resistant starch are two types of prebiotics. Inulin is a water-soluble dietary fiber that is not absorbed by the enzymes at the upper section of he the digestive system and is partially fermented and metabolized by the microbial flora of the colon. Digestion-resistant starch is another prebiotic that acts as a food fiber and adds to the nutritional value. It can also improve the structure of the final product. In recent years, the rise in consumer awareness about health benefits of prebiotics has increased interests in functional foods particularly in bakery products. The present study qualitatively analyzed the effect of the prebiotics (i.e. inulin and resistant starch) on rheological properties of baguette bread doughs.

Materials and Methods: The study treatments are: Baking dough w/o inulin and resistant starch (Control); baking dough w 2.5% inulin (based on flour weight); baking dough w 5% inulin (based on flour weight); baking dough w 2.5% resistant starch (based on flour weight); baking dough w 5% inulin (based on flour weight); baking dough w 2.5% inulin + 2.5% resistant starch (based on flour weight); baking dough w 2.5% inulin + 5% resistant starch (based on flour weight); baking dough w 5% inulin + 2.5% resistant starch (based on flour weight); baking dough w 5% inulin + 5% resistant starch (based on flour weight). The treatments were rheologically tested by farinograph and extensograph after preparation. Study data were then analyzed using the completely randomized design. Means of data were also compared by Duncan's multiple-range test (α = 5%) in SPSS 16.

Results and Discussion: According to the results, the different levels of prebiotics (inulin and resistant starch) significantly improved dough water absorption compared to the control samples. This can be due to the presence of hydroxyl groups in the structure of the prebiotics, which increased the number of hydrogen bonds and thus water absorption in all treatments compared to the control. Moreover, these additives led to significantly higher dough development time than the control. This can be due to the hydroxyl groups in the structure of inulin and resistant starch, which increased the number of hydrogen bonds and thus cross-bonding with water. These additives also significantly increased the dough stability time compared to the control.This is a result of hydrogen attachments and hydroxyl bonding between gluten proteins (made up of glutenin and gliadin) and the prebiotics (inulin and resistant starch) that in turn improved the stability and strength of the doughs. As the dough stability increased, the dough softening degree after 10 and 12 minutes was also reduced, which was due to the hydrogen bonds resulting from hydroxyl cross-links of gluten with inulin and resistant starch. Note that the quality index increased when the stability and strength were improved compared to the control dough. According to the results, by adding different levels of inulin and resistant starch, the dough energy rised higher than the control sample after 45, 90 and 135 minutes. This is again due to (OH) hydroxyl bonds with hydrogen attachments between glutens and the prebiotics. In this regard, the highest resistance to extension after 45, 90 and 135 min was recorded for the treatments containing inulin and resistant starch whereas its lowest value was recorded for the control. This is due to the stable continuous lattice made by amylose in resistant starch granules, which led to the higher strength of other treatments than the control. Additionally, the increased dough resistance to extension can be due to the interaction of inulin and resistant starch with flour proteins. Regarding extensibility, significant differences were observed between the treatments and the control within all three time intervals. Accordingly, after 45, 90 and 135 min, the control treatment had the highest extensibility whereas the treatment with 5% inulin + 5% resistant starch (based on flour weight) had the lowest level of this parameter within these times. The increases in strength and stability of the doughs were caused by strong links between glutens and these prebiotics, which reduced the dough extensibility. The results showed that the highest dough ratio number after 45, 90 and 135 min belonged to the treatment with 5% inulin + 5% resistant starch (based on flour weight). The lowest ratio number was recorded for the control in these time periods. The gluten was the main factor behind dough stability. The large amount of hydroxyl groups in the structure of inulin and resistant starch led to formation of a better structured three-dimensional gluten lattice. In general, by taking all parameters into account, the treatment with 5% inulin + 5% resistant starch was selected as the best treatment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Inulin
• Resistant Starch
• Prebiotics
• Dough Rheology
• Baguette Bread

مراجع

Abdel-Aal, E-S., Hucl, P., Chibbar, R., Han, H. and Demeke, T., 2002, Physicochemical and Structural Characteristics of Flours andStarches from Waxy and Nonwaxy Wheats 1. Cereal Chemistry, 79(3): 458-464.

Afshinpajouh, R., Heydarian, S., Amini, M., Saadatmand, E. and Yahyavi, M., 2014, Studies on physical, chemical and rheological characteristics of pasta dough influenced by inulin. African Journal of Food, 8(1): 9-13.

Anonymous, 2000, Approved Methods of American Association of Cereal Chemists. (10th ed), St Paul, Minn, USA.

Anonymous, 2003, Approved Methods of American Association of Cereal Chemists. (10th ed), St Paul, Minn, USA.

Anonymous, 2012, Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran. Wheat flour- Specifications and Test methods, Islamic Republic of Iran, NO 103.

Aravind, N., Sissons, M. and Fellows, C.M., 2012, Effect of soluble fibre (guar gum and carboxymethylcellulose) addition on technological, sensory and structural properties of durum wheat spaghetti. Food Chemistry, 131(3): 893- 900.

Barclay, T., Ginic-Markovic, M., Cooper, P. and Petrovsky, N., 2010, Inulin A versatile polysaccharide with multiple pharmaceutical and food chemical uses. Journal of Excipients and Food Chemistry, 1(3): 27–50.

Buddrick, O., Jones, O., Hughes, J., Kong, I. and Small, D., 2015, the effect of fermentation and addition of vegetable oil on resistant starch formation in wholegrain breads. Food Chemistry, 180: 181–185

Barclay, T., Ginic-Markovic, M., Cooper, P. and Petrovsky, N., 2010, Inulin – A versatile polysaccharide with multiple pharmaceutical and food chemical uses. Journal of Excipients and Food Chemistry, 1(3): 27–50.

Cavallero, A., Empilli, S., Brighenti, F. and Stanca, A., 2002, High (1→3, 1→4)-betaglucan barley ractions in bread making and their effects on human glycemic response. Journal of Cereal Science, 36(1): 59-66.

Chimrov, J. I., Braudo, E. E. and Tolstoguzov, V. B., 1981, the manufacture and application of pasta as a food and as a food ingredient: A review. Die Nahrung, 25: 719-729.

Costin, G. and Segal, R., 1999, Alimente functionale, Galaţi Ed. Academica, 323-348.

Frutos, M. J., Guilabert-Anton, L., Tomas-Bellido, A. and Hernandez-Herrero, J. A., 2008, Effect of artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) fiber on textural and sensory qualities of wheat bread. Food Science and Technology International, 14(5): 49–55.

Ghamari, M., Peighambardoust, S. H. and Reshmeh Karim, K., 2009, Application of farinograph quality number (FQN) in evaluating baking quality of wheat. Food Research, 6(2): 23-33.

Gibson, G. and Roberfroid, M., 1995, Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiotia: introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition, 125: 1401-1412.

Hager, A., Ryan, L.A. Schwab, M.C., Jaenzle, M.G., O’Doherty, J. V. and Arendt, E.K., 2011, Influence of the soluble fibres inulin and oet beta-glucan on quality of dough and bread. Journal of Europen Food Research and Technology, 232(3): 405-413.

Iranshahi, M., Seyedain Ardebili, S. M. and Yasini Ardakani, S. A., 2014, Effect of inulin and β-glucan on the physicochemical, rheological, and sensory properties barbari bread. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(6): 90-97.

Iranshahi, M., Seyedain Ardebili, M. and Yasini Ardakani, A. 2014. Survey effect of inulin and β-glucan on barbari bread staling. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences, 9: 1039-1043.

Jane, J., Chen, Y., Lee, L., McPherson, A., Wong, K. and Radosavljevic, M., 1999, Effects of amylopectin branch chain length and amylose content on the gelatinization and pasting properties of starch1. Cereal Chemistry, 76(5): 629-637.

Jones, R. W. and Erlander, S. R., 1967, Interactions between wheat proteins and dextrans. Cereal Chemistry, 44: 447-453.

Karolini-Skaradzinska, Z., Bihuniak, P., Piotrowska, E. and Wdowik, L., 2007, Properties of dough and qualitative characteristics of wheat bread with addition of inulin. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 57(4(B)): 267–270.

Kulamarva, A., 2005, Rheological and thermal properties of sorghum dough. MSc Thesis, Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, pp.1-94.

Meyer, D. and Peters, B., 2009, enhancing the nutritional value of bread with inulin. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech, 20(3): 48–50.

Miyazaki, M., Van Hung, P., Maeda, T. and Morita, N., 2006, recent advances in application of modified starches for breadmaking.Trends in Food Science and Technology, 17(11): 591-599.

Mohebbi, Z., Homayouni, A., Azizi, M. H., Asghari Jafarabadi, M. and Afshinpajouh, R., 2016, Influence of β - glucan and resistant starch prebiotics on dough rheology. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 13(50): 183-193.

Movahhed, S., Zharfi, S. and Ahmadi Chenarbon, H., 2014, Investigation of rheological of dough and organoleptic properties of Toast bread containing Banana flour. Iranian Food Science and Technology Research Journal, 9(4): 359-365.

Movahed, S., 2011, The Science of Bread. Marz-e Danesh Press, PP. 31-35.

Ozer, D., Akin, S. and Ozer, B., 2005, Effects of inulin and lactulose on survival of Lactobacillus Acido philus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium Bifidum BB- 02 in Acidophilus- Bifidus yogurt. Food Science and Technology International, 11(1): 19-24.

Rodriguez-Cabezas, M. E., Camuesco, D., Arribas, B., Garrido-Mesa, N., Comalada, M. and Bailon, E., 2010, the combination of fructooligosaccharides and resistant starch shows prebiotic additive effects in rats. Clinical Nutrition, 29(6): 832-839.

Silva, R. F., 1996, Use of inulin as a natural texture modifier. Cereal Foods World, 41(10): 792-795.

Skara, N., Novotni, D., Cukelj, N., Smerdel, B. and Curic, D., 2013, Combined effects of inulin, pectin and guar gum on the quality and stability of partially baked frozen bread. Food Hydrocolloids, 30(1): 428 - 436.

Skendi, A., Papageorgiou, M. and Biliaderis, C. G., 2009, Effect of barley β-glucan molecular size and level on wheat dough rheological properties. Journal of Food Engineering, 91(4): 594-601.

Uyeno, Y., Sekiguchi, Y. and Kamagata, Y., 2008, Impact of consumption of probiotic lactobacillicontaining yogurt on microbial composition in human feces. International journal of Food Microbiology, 122(1): 16-22.

Vignaux, N., Doehlert, D. C., Hegstad, J., Elias, E. M., McMullen, M. S. and Grant, L. A., 2004, Grain quality characteristics and milling performance of full and partial waxy durum lines. Cereal Chemistry, 81(3): 377-83.

Wang, R., Rosell, C. M. and Benedito de Barber, C., 2002, Effect of the addition of different fibres on wheat dough performance and bread quality. Food Chemistry, 79(2): 221-226.

Zaidul, I. M., Karim, A. A., Manan, D., Ariffin, A., Norulaini, N. N. and Mohd Omar, A., 2004, A farinograph study on the viscoelastic properties of sago/wheat flour dough systems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 84: 616-22.